PitbLAWg may be AWOL on January 18, 2012.
In a USA Today article “TwitPic, WordPress to go dark for online SOPA protest” Yamiche Alcindor reported that WordPress, along with other websites will not available on Wednesday January 18, 2012 to protest the proposed US legislation, Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act.
WordPress is the host site for PitbLAWg. If WordPress is not available then PitbLAWg will not be online for the day. However, we expect that WordPress and PitbLAWg with be back up and running on Thursday January 19th.
PitbLAWg takes no position on the proposed legislation or on the blackout. Thanks for following PitbLAWg and we hope to see you back on January 19th.
Toyota advertising case raises privacy issues
In 2009, a woman initiated a lawsuit against a Californian advertising firm and Toyota U.S.A. because of an aggressive advertising campaign that she claimed was designed to make individuals believe they were being stalked by a criminal (which, in fact, turned out to be fictitious). While the charges are now being dealt with by the Los Angeles Superior Court the case raises issues in respect of the application of privacy principles here in Canada.
In 2008, Toyota Matrix advertised the “Your Other You” campaign which targeted young males. It encouraged individuals to provide someone else’s personal information, who would then receive an invitation to a fake personality test. What really happened was, the “victim” ended up receiving numerous disturbing emails from an imaginary soccer hooligan with a pitbull named Trigger. This impersonator claimed to be on their way to the victim’s house, who had no idea it was a hoax. In order to promote the advertising campaign, a fake social networking account for the stalker was even set up.
How would a similar case play out here in Canada? Under the PIPEDA framework , there would possibly be a violation of the law because of the alleged collection, use and disclosure of personal information without consent. Further, PIPEDA’s requirement that the “identified purposes” of any collection, use or disclosure of personal information would not likely met. Finally, the reasonableness test, enshrined in PIPEDA, would probably be violated. In short, the facts pertaining to the case could put the relevant parties in the crosshairs of the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada and courts. As a result, the case should serve as a warning to advertising agencies to ensure that privacy law considerations are thoroughly canvassed with legal counsel before initiating campaigns involving personal information – especially where people are submitting friends’ data.
Are you a spammer? What you need to know about Canada’s new anti-spam law
Tired of reading? How about a video to help you learn about Canada’s new anti-spam law? I’m delighted to let you know about a cool feature on Pitblado’s new website called the “Whiteboard Sessions”, which are vlogs (or video blogs). We’ve just posted a 3 minute vlog of mine entitled “Are you a spammer?“, wherein I discuss:
- highlights of the new law
- why you should care
- an overview of the rules
- penalties for non-compliance; and
- proactive tips to help comply with the law
To watch “Are you a spammer?” please click here>>
Privacy Commissioner releases report on online tracking, profiling and targeting, and cloud computing
Canada’s Privacy Commissioner has just released the final report of her Office’s consultations on the online tracking, profiling and targeting of consumers by marketers and other businesses. “Most people have no idea about the rich trail of data they leave behind when they browse the Internet, use social networking sites, or engage the geo-location functions of their mobile devices,” the Commissioner observed. Organizations that track the online activities of Canadians must be more upfront about their practices, Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has concluded… “it comes down to meaningful consent, which entails informed consent”.
Fines needed to help stem growing data breaches, Privacy Commissioner says
The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has called for legislation empowering her to impose substantial fines against major corporations that fail to adequately protect Canadians’ personal information from preventable breaches.
“I am deeply troubled by the large number of major breaches we are seeing, including serious incidents in recent weeks that have affected hundreds of thousands of Canadians,’’ Jennifer Stoddart said in a speech today at the Canada 3.0 forum in Stratford, Ont. “It seems to me that it’s time to begin imposing fines – significant, attention-getting fines – on companies when poor privacy and security practices lead to breaches.’’
To learn more, read the complete news release.
The case against Big Brother at work
Here’s a good article in the Globe & Mail’s Report on Business about the thorny issue of workplace monitoring. As I’m quoted by the Globe & Mail, “I recognize employers have risks and obligations to manage data, but on the other hand going to a more Big Brother approach isn’t the answer. And the privacy commissioner and the courts would agree with that.” Read the full article here>
A Conversation with Elizabeth Denham, British Columbia’s Information and Privacy Commissioner
Continuing a series of posts on my “On the Cutting Edge” blog that I’m calling “A Conversation with…”, I’m delighted to post a conversation with Elizabeth Denham, British Columbia’s new Information and Privacy Commissioner. If you’d like to read the conversation click here>>
Previous posts include “conversations” with Jennifer Stoddart (Canada’s Privacy Commissioner), Frank Work (Alberta’s Information and Privacy Commissioner), Irene Hamilton (Manitoba’s Ombudsman), Dr. Ann Cavoukian (Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner) and Gary Dickson, Q.C. (Saskatchewan’s Information and Privacy Commissioner).
Canada’s Privacy Commissioner tables Annual Report on PIPEDA
Earlier today, Canada’s Privacy Commissioner, Jennifer Stoddart, submitted to Parliament the Office of the Privacy Commissioner’s Annual Report on PIPEDA for the period from January 1 to December 31, 2009.
As the Commissioner notes, “the dominant theme of [the OPC's] work in 2009 was the protection of privacy in an increasingly online, borderless world. A case in point was the investigation that resulted in more public attention than any other in [the OPC's] history: Facebook.” The Commissioner notes two key issues, namely, Data without borders and Risks remaining in the wake of mortgage broker breaches.
A Conversation with Saskatchewan’s Information and Privacy Commissioner
Continuing a series of posts on my “On the Cutting Edge” blog that I’m calling “A Conversation with…”, I’m delighted to post a conversation with Saskatchewan’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, Gary Dickson, Q.C. If you’re interested in reading the conversation, please click here.
Previous posts include “conversations” with Jennifer Stoddart (Canada’s Privacy Commissioner), Frank Work (Alberta’s Information and Privacy Commissioner), Irene Hamilton (Manitoba’s Ombudsman) and Dr. Ann Cavoukian (Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner).
A Conversation with Dr. Ann Cavoukian, Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner
Continuing a series of posts on my “On the Cutting Edge” blog that I’m calling “A Conversation with…” I’m delighted to post a conversation with Ontario’s Information and Privacy Commissioner, Dr. Ann Cavoukian. If you’re interested in reading the conversation, please click here.
Previous posts include “conversations” with Jennifer Stoddart (Canada’s Privacy Commissioner), Frank Work (Alberta’s Information and Privacy Commissioner) and Irene Hamilton (Manitoba’s Ombudsman).