PitbLAWg

Law for Business

PitbLAWg may be AWOL on January 18, 2012.

In a USA Today article “TwitPic, WordPress to go dark for online SOPA protest” Yamiche Alcindor reported that WordPress, along with other websites will not available on Wednesday January 18, 2012 to protest the proposed US legislation, Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect Intellectual Property Act.

WordPress is the host site for PitbLAWg. If WordPress is not available then PitbLAWg will not be online for the day. However, we expect that WordPress and PitbLAWg with be back up and running on Thursday January 19th.

PitbLAWg takes no position on the proposed legislation or on the blackout. Thanks for following PitbLAWg and we hope to see you back on January 19th.

January 17, 2012 Posted by | Blogs, E-mail, Identity Theft, Intellectual Property, Legislation, Mobile devices, Online Reputation Management, PIPEDA, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner, social networking vehicles, Social Networking Websites, Uncategorized | , , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Choose Your Words Carefully!

 

Remember that email exchange you had with an individual a year ago? Now that you are in litigation with that individual, the email may be relevant.

The Manitoba Court of Queen’s Bench Rules require that any and all relevant documents must be produced in the course of litigation and the term documents includes more than you may think!

Regardless of your means of communication, it is important to remember that what you say and how you say it may be relevant to future litigation.

Here are a just a few suggestions on how you may choose your words carefully next time before you press the send button.

 

September 1, 2011 Posted by | Access to Information, Blogs, Corporate Information, Defamation, Due Diligence, E-mail, Employee Monitoring, Employment Standards, Labour and Employment, Mobile devices, Uncategorized | , , , , , | Leave a Comment

Privacy Commissioner releases report on online tracking, profiling and targeting, and cloud computing

Canada’s Privacy Commissioner has just released the final report of her Office’s consultations on the online tracking, profiling and targeting of consumers by marketers and other businesses. “Most people have no idea about the rich trail of data they leave behind when they browse the Internet, use social networking sites, or engage the geo-location functions of their mobile devices,” the Commissioner observed.  Organizations that track the online activities of Canadians must be more upfront about their practices, Privacy Commissioner Jennifer Stoddart has concluded… “it comes down to meaningful consent, which entails informed consent”.

May 6, 2011 Posted by | Access to Information, Cloud Computing, Data Protection, Identity Theft, Marketing, Mobile devices, Personal Information, PIPEDA, Privacy, Privacy Commissioner, Social Networking Websites, Technology, Uncategorized | , , , , , , | Leave a Comment

It Pays to Be a Safe Driver

Studies have shown that driving while using a cell phone reduces the amount of brain activity associated with driving by 37%.  In response to these alarming statistics, other provinces have been introducing legislation to ban the use of hand-held cell phones while driving.  My colleague, Brad Madison, provided an update for Ontario in his post entitled, “Hands Free Only in Cottage Country”.  Now Manitoba has adopted a similar approach via The Highway Traffic Amendment Act (Promoting Safer and Healthier Conditions in Motor Vehicles) (the “Act“).  Effective July 15, 2010, Manitoba drivers caught by police in using a “hand-operated electronic device” will face a $191 fine. 

So how do you avoid this stiff fine?  Here are the details.

The Act applies to more than just the use of cell phones.  It applies to all  ”hand operated electronic devices” which includes:

a) a cell phone;

b) a pager;

c) a Blackberry;

d) an iPhone;

e) another electronic device that:

 i) includes a telephone function; and
ii) normally is held in the user’s hand during use or requires the user to use his/her hand to operate any of its functions;

f) an electronic device that is not otherwise described above but that:

i) is capable of transmitting or receiving e-mail or other text based messages; and
ii) normally is held in the user’s hand during use or requires the user to use his/her hand to operate any of its functions; or
iii) any other electronic device that is prescribed as a hand operated electronic device by the regulations that accompany the Act.

The prohibition applies to:

a) receiving or placing calls;

b) checking for phone messages;

c) text messaging;

d) surfing the internet;

e) receiving or responding to e-mails;

f) simply holding the cellular device in a position in which it may be used;

g) operating any of the cellular device’s functions;

h) looking at the device’s display; and

i) taking any other action prohibited by regulation.

The Act provides exceptions for persons using cell phones to call or send messages to police, the fire department or ambulance services about an emergency.  There is also an exception for the use of cell phones by police, fire and ambulance personnel.

So next time your want to make a phone call or send a text message while driving, stop your vehicle in a safe place off the roadway before operating your phone.

Drive safe, Manitobans.

June 21, 2010 Posted by | Legislation, Mobile devices | , , | Leave a Comment

Hands Free only in Cottage Country

You probably know that, while a new law is coming, talking on your cell phone while driving in Manitoba, though not a good idea, is not illegal… yet.  (The Manitoba law has been passed but is awaiting proclamation.) Indications are that Manitobans may see this new law come into force by mid 2010.

What you might not know is that on October 26, 2009, it became illegal to talk on your cell phone while driving in Ontario.  Unlike Manitoba’s law, Ontario’s distracted driver law and regulation has come into force.   

It is now illegal in Ontario to use a hand-held wireless communication device, other device capable of receiving or transmitting telephone communications, electronic data, mail or text messages or a hand-held electronic “entertainment device” unless it is in “hands-free” mode.

There are some exceptions.  If the hands-free device is securely mounted in the vehicle where it can be easily reached and seen at a “quick glance” a driver is permitted to push a button on it to make, answer, or end a cell phone call.  However, pushing multiple buttons (say, to dial a number) does not appear to be permitted.  To legally make calls while driving in Ontario then, you must use a cell phone with voice dialing capability and you must use a head set, have the phone plugged into the vehicle’s audio system, or use speakerphone (so long as to do so does not require multiple pushes of buttons).

The rules are actually rather complex and there are further exemptions including those for emergency personnel, commercial drivers and calling 9-1-1.  For more detail, see this Osler Update.

Additionally, a display screen of a television, computer or other device unrelated to the safe operation of the vehicle must not be visible to the driver.  GPS systems, collision avoidance systems, and vehicle information systems are still permitted. 

For most of us, the best idea is to let incoming calls go to voicemail and safely pull off the road and stop or park the vehicle before making any phone calls.

January 25, 2010 Posted by | Legislation, Mobile devices | , | Leave a Comment

Smartphones in the workplace: what’s your business doing to manage the risk?

(Previously published on Brian Bowman – On the Cutting Edge on July 6, 2009)

Recently, an interesting article in the Globe and Mail dealt with the issue of smartphone etiquette. Business professionals fidgeting with their BlackBerrys and iPhones in meetings, walking through airports with eyes glued to their small glowing screens and operating their devices in restrooms may seem unrealistic at first blush, but is it really? The reality is that smartphones have permeated the business world. They are everywhere, they are powerful and have the potential to be extremely damaging.

Breaches of confidential corporate data and personal information are nothing new to the business world, but smartphones have brought a new dimension to the problem. Smartphones are starting to make appearances in Canadian court cases in a supporting role, but it won’t be long before they are squarely in the spotlight. The latest iPhone model has up to 32GB of memory while BlackBerrys can store vast amounts of data on memory cards. The equivalent of entire filing cabinets can now be carried around conveniently in your shirt pocket. This reality has increased the risk for massive privacy breaches in the blink of an eye.

The big question is how involved should employers be in regulating and monitoring their employees use of smartphones? All encompassing monitoring of employee smartphone use is a touchy area, but the permeation of smartphones in today’s corporate world and the corresponding risks to businesses necessitates (at the very least) that relevant guidelines concerning their use in the workplace should be implemented by employers. All it takes to damage a business is for one employee to misplace their smartphone without having first activated their security settings.

January 4, 2010 Posted by | Employee Monitoring, Mobile devices | , , , | Leave a Comment

   

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 105 other followers